Love of My Life … Love for All of Life's Goods: God, Self, Family, Nation & Creation
"Hate evil & Love Good" … "Whoever is without love does not know God for God is Love" Master Forum: Love for Good … "Love Never Fails"
| American Penitentiary or Sanctuary: Playboy v. the Pope |
30 Jun |
“There are certain things only a government can do.” President Obama
“The Lightning Speed of Honesty.”
”The world of politics is always 20 years behind the world of thought.” J. J. Chapman
What kind of government ignores, tolerates or protects injustice?
A government without a good horse, speedy justice or just laws.
If we were free to choose between Playboy ideology and Pope’s Christian Anthropology, Americans might be thriving instead of merely surviving. To date, most traditionalists would be very grateful for a close bond between God and Uncle Sam—beliefs of most liberals are quite different. A liberal rule of law seems tragically reminiscent of King Henry VIII. A genuine liberal quest for adulteration of traditional American values is like an adulterous hunger for lust and greed void of accountability and empathy for the victims. As such, when liberals work on our behalf most of us not only lose our minds but we also lose our families, children, religion, integrity, rights, liberty, property and empowerment. It has never been a secret that mainstream Americans haven’t been protected for years. To date, major power players and organizations are dedicated to self-service instead of public service. When will Enough be Enough? For our government to be slow is one thing—to slowly market and protect injustice is unconscionable and unconstitutional. “Justice delayed is justice denied.”
“On your behalf: What APA is doing for you – Psychology plays key role in same-sex marriage gains - The number of states recognizing gay marriage more than doubled in April, due in large measure to efforts by psychologists and APA. Iowa’s Supreme Court struck down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage April 3, citing research from an APA amicus curiae brief, which states that there is no research basis to justify discrimination against same-sex couples.” American Psychological Association
On your behalf? What your government is doing for you – “May 21, 2009 – The House Foreign Affairs Committee yesterday approved the creation of a new Office of Global Women’s Issues. However, the committee voted down efforts by one congressman to ensure that the office would not implement the radical abortion agenda espoused by both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.” Kathleen Gilbert - LifeSiteNews
On your behalf? What your President is doing for you – “May 8, 2009 – Obama’s First 100 Days: The anti-life plan is now established.” Fr. Alphonse de Valk, Editor, Catholic Insight (LifeSiteNews)
On your behalf? What your local officials are doing for you – New Research Shows True Price Of State Divorce Laws – “Dr. Kathy Garcia-Lawson, a clinical psychologist in Palm Beach, Florida, says No-fault divorce laws violate constitutional protections and individual rights. She is part of a team of experts that began calling for state and federal investigations after documents revealed the costs and agenda behind these worn out laws.” … “In light of the growing body of research documenting the harmful effects of divorce laws – on children in particular – Dr. Lawson has taken her concerns to top state officials.” … “Top Florida officials have denied that any real problem exists and have been hostile to further inquiries, Dr. Lawson said. But officials in other states have been more receptive.” Paul Symons, The Liberty Sentinel of Florida
On your behalf? What your legislators are doing for you - ”Divorce law is a lot like the third rail. Nobody wants to touch it. It’s going to affect every family. Plus, you have plenty of legislators who are divorced themselves, who left their first wives and think no-fault divorce is a great thing. Those people are not likely to support no-fault divorce reform.” Mike McManus, Marriage Savers
On your behalf? What ABA is doing for you - ”After two weeks and dozens of calls, the top person in the American Bar Association finally talked to me about No Fault Divorce … In any other law suit, the sued person always can get their day in court and can present evidence arguing the case. The judge hears both sides and makes a decision based on which person’s evidence is most compelling … Not in Family Law Court. The person suing for divorce ALWAYS wins … The law is not constitutional because it exists, but because it has not been successfully challenged. How is it constitutional for the opponent of a No Fault divorce to ALWAYS lose? And lots of life, liberty and property are taken in a divorce.” Mike McManus, Marriage Savers
On your behalf? What religious & secular leaders are doing for you - An Attempt to Inject Divorce Reform into the 2008 Election – “Frankly, my hope is that this book [How To Cut America’s Divorce Rate in Half] will put No Fault Divorce Reform into the 2008 political campaign … I persuaded former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to write the Foreword, in which he asserted, ‘McManus understands the essential need for society to make lasting marriages a priority and details the vital steps to help make this happen.’ I tried to get Rev. Rick Warren to ask the Presidential candidates where they stood on changes in state law that could cut divorce rates in half. He did not do so.” Mike McManus, Marriage Savers
On your behalf? What your attorneys are doing for you - ”The Major Obstacle: Divorce Attorneys – I served on the Virginia Marriage Commission last year which proposed replacing No Fault Divorce with Mutual Consent in cases involving children. It was very difficult to get any legislator to introduce the bill, and it never got a hearing. Why? Fully 100% of the committee members to consider the bill are attorneys, many of whom make a good living on breaking up marriages. Of course, they are not interested in reform. But why should those who profit from the destruction of marriages control the law, as they have for four decades? Therefore, my book proposes second substantive reform: ask the Feds for help.” Mike McManus, Marriage Savers
On Our Behalf? Any major leader or organization working on our behalf and powerful enough to shape minds and lives of American people must be held accountable for their actions. Fundamental needs of every human being are much simpler than our leaders and laws would have us be-live. After all, natural laws of life apply to every man, woman and child because they are universal.
2271 – Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law.”
492 - Principal sins against chastity – Grave sins against chastity differ according to their object: adultery, masturbation, fornication, pornography, prostitution, rape, and homosexual acts.”
494 – Insofar as it is bound to promote respect for the dignity of the person, civil authority should seek to create an environment conducive to the practice of chastity. It should also enact suitable legislation to prevent the spread of the grave offenses against chastity mentioned above, especially in order to protect minors and those who are the weakest members of society.”
Food for Thought: According to President Obama, ”Protecting the Safety of our food and drugs is one of the most fundamental responsibilities government has.” Who will protect America’s fundamental values and inalienable rights of every man, woman and child in America?
With majority of Americans claiming to have religious roots, a “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” should never overrule, hinder or inhibit fundamental laws of God or nature. If traditional values were hazardous to individuals and society, it would be our government’s duty to replace them with modern values—nonetheless, differences between value of traditionalism and modernism speak for themselves—-it is quite obvious that protection of honor and stability is not the same as protection of dishonor and chaos created by homosexuality, adultery, feminism and others; ergo, to protect modern values is irrational, dangerous and unconstitutional. One would hope that all Presidents or all top officials within major organizations are capable of discernment between good and bad or right and wrong. Unfortunately, modern leaders have exhibited tendencies to protect dirty little secrets and unjust laws instead of championing and protecting healthy ideologies and just laws. The Obama administration has not been in power long enough for President Obama to be blamed for our crisis—nonetheless, President Obama is reaping the benefits of a lengthy and brutal crisis custom designed by liberalism to rape conservatism.
Only casualties of our crisis would still insist that private lives do not influence professionalism or public service. Aside from inherent financial fraud, it’s within corruption’s nature to create an endless chain reaction and pain that devour everyone in sight—when it comes to affairs, the distraction from one’s love and duties to one’s family and profession creates the same destruction whether it’s a one-sided love affair with internet pornography or whether it’s an extramarital affair in a nearby motel or another country. To be in love with adultery makes no logical, religious, emotional nor physical sense. Because we’ve been socialized to romanticize adultery and ignore the agony of victimized spouses and children, its toxic cycles continue to penalize victims and glorify the perpetrators, if not in public then in private. As such, instead of the adulteress and adulterer offering sincere apologies to the victims which would end the adultery and reconcile the family, most adulterous couples prefer to flaunt and enjoy their adultery through cohabitation or divorce and remarriage. Currently, end of adulterous cycles is as easy as end of homosexuality and abortion because they reinforced each other—due to social engineering, our laws and society sustain them and harm all of the victims.
Can adulterous spouses be good parents? No—as long as they maintain adulterous lifestyles, all of their actions are in the best interest of their adultery and never in the best interest of their violated spouse and children. End of adultery ends violations and restores individual dignity and stability of the family—as such, all men and women addicted to adultery can become good parents only after sincere remorse, apologies, change and reparations which is the ONLY way to end all sexual addictions and adulterous relationships.
Although it’s quite benevolent that most Republicans and Democrats still agree to protect children of families victimized by adultery and keep them away from the harsh realities of public forums—who gave public figures or pathetic bloggers the right to brutalize and mock adults—victims and perpetrators—in the darkest and most agonizing hardships of their lives? “Civil” America? While civil and honest disclosure of all facts is vital to healing and stability of individuals, families and society, it should be done with charity, not brutality fueled by need for fame, money or power. To make one’s fortune or mark in life at the expense of tragedy is tragic, not magic—since it’s not even remotely humane, one would think our society could use all the help we can get. Given that biting remarks and behaviors of countless respected journalists or luminary experts are more like those of rabid animals, perhaps PETA could temporarily shift their focus and money to restore humane treatment of people!
When it comes to civil and religious rights, our options are few. Having the ability to make minor choices in life is not the same as having the rights within the most important areas of our lives: love, children, religion, natural laws of life or a choice between being a man or a woman, single, married or divorced. As such, President Obama’s zeal to ensure safety of our foods and drugs is important but ensuring safety of our families & faiths should have received top billing due to our society’s crisis. None will argue that proper labeling and truth in information about hazardous ideologies and behaviors were more critical than taking on such a “grave hazard” as Cheerios! Countless people have already died from first and second-hand smoking guns behind No-fault divorce, shared child custody, abortion, homosexuality and others. Unfortunately, liberal agendas remain sadly unchanged and unchallenged. As such, instead of resuscitation, traditional values suffered another blow and castration. President Obama’s extending health care and other benefits to the partners of gay federal employees is an official, federal seal of approval for homosexuality—by default, it is yet another official federal violation of religious and natural laws of life. Contraception was the first violation, No-fault divorce was second and abortion was third—the road to equality for the gay rights has been intertwined within all old and new violations for years. As such, thanks to the Obama administration, upgrades and labels for food safety will bring peace of mind when ”Choosy moms, and dads, choose jif” but not on vital issues of life—when it comes to safety of our faiths and protection of our families, ”We the People” will continue to get gypped.
Even though most liberals are highly arrogant and defiant, even they would not dare to outlaw religious freedom; ergo, they merely legalized laws which overruled religious laws, teachings and therefore, ways of life. Contraception enabled teen sex as well as sexual freedom before, during and after marriage. No-fault divorce eliminated the Commandment against adultery. Abortion eliminated the Commandment against killing but only when it is fits liberal agendas. As such, liberals managed to demolish all traditional religions without one shot being fired—without one specific anti-religious law and without physical force, majority of religious followers began to violate their own moral laws on contraception, adultery, homosexuality, abortion & others. Although it’s NOW against the law, liberals are still blowing second-hand laws with more arrogance than in 1960. Once they’ve empowered themselves to do as they please, ease of pleasing themselves in private and in public is in our face daily. Our Vice President will not sound an alarm either even though the bottom line is ever more below the line of poverty and human dignity. Considering that traditionalists are being violated, intimidated, mocked and degraded for decades, ”don’t ask/don’t tell” is now more applicable to Jews and Christians than to homosexuals. The Obama administration had clear choice—Support for the Federal Marriage Amendment or Gay Rights. Considering President Obama’s famed IQ, speaking about ”irreconcilable differences” is not the same as resolving them. Reverse conditioning in countless areas is already a reality—reverse conditioning in contraception, adultery & privacy rights is as easy as education and legislation. When it comes to homosexuality and marriage equality, it does not take a genius to comprehend why ”don’t ask/don’t tell” should be reversed to apply to homosexuality not Judaism or Christianity!
Even if the Obama administration’s allergy to tea is curable, even China might not have enough money to come up with a bailout big enough to pay reparations to jillions of America’s victims. Since laws are the most powerful agents of change, the only other viable restitution might be end of injustice through a change in laws. Since President Obama already apologized to almost everyone else in the world, an apology and a full disclosure of our crisis might begin to reconcile those “irreconcilable differences” as well as begin a Change all of US Can Believe In.
